Science Had Already Proven Nonexistence Of God. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Science Had Already Proven Nonexistence Of God.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on November 28, 2001 20:30:18 UTC

In any definable form.

It is believers who are now so lost about God (because science evicted him from every possible corner) that they simply do not know what God is (what is left from His mightyness).

If they do not know God, then the question about prowing/disproving of existence of "I do not know what I am talking about (=God)" vanishes.

No subject - no questions about it.

Follow Ups:

Alex: Stephen Hawking found God but didn't recognise Him - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:25 UTC
- Hawkins and many Nobelists belive in god. They are just wrong. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:11 UTC
  - They also believed in ether(nt) - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 15:14 UTC
    - There also was this guy who thought... - smartguy - November 29, 2001 - 15:56 UTC
      - fortunately, science does not deal with beliefs, but with facts. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 22:48 UTC
        
        You are the second biggest "arguer from authority" on this list - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
        
        I just state the fact(hat schience deals with facts,not belifs) - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 04:06 UTC
        
        Alex: do you believe this to be a fact? - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:23 UTC
        
        Regardless my belief, science deals with FACTS. - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
  - Hawking defines God as "Universal Order" - sound familiar? (nt) - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:42 UTC
    - Just another name of math (logic). - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:23 UTC
      - But Hawking recognizes the need for higher dimensions (nt) - luis_hamburgh - December 1, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
Alex: the subject is: EXISTENCE IS WHO IS. - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:29 UTC
- Alan, you said nonsence statements (beings, trios, etc). - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:02 UTC
  - I am talking about a certain claim - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:27 UTC
It's logically impossible to prove inexistence of God (nt - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
- No, vice versa: logically god simply does NOT exist. - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
  - You cannot change logic, only your image of stubbornness. - luis_hamburgh - December 7, 2001 - 03:00 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins