Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Your (plural) Love Of Science

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on November 27, 2001 20:37:44 UTC

Your forum's topic being God and Science, why do we not use a science format or strictly science syntax or etiquette? It makes us seem all like religionists.

My email at shows I do love digression.
But now for an example of being strict:

Excellent information may be exchanged with love and enthusiasm, without employing the scientific conventions in this forum's articles about God and science. We define love and enthusiasm in this article very loosely, because their vagueness will not affect our thesis. Our thesis is that the strictest logic and testable equations will support Jesus's claim to be God -- but will not support making Paul's legacy into binding law for all God's creatures.


I believe this is a good thesis.

However, it would still leave problems:

"Oh, Thou, who Man of baser Earth didst make;
And ev'n with Paradise devise the Snake:
For all the Sin wherewith the Face of Man
Is blacken'd -- Man's forgiveness give -- and take!"
-- Omar Khayyam
Poet-Astronomer of Persia

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins