I Don't Think You Need More Than 3 Dimensions. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Don't Think You Need More Than 3 Dimensions.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on November 20, 2001 16:48:20 UTC

All those permutations do not require more than 3 spatial dimensions.

If you do not trust me - send it to experts (any serious physics journal), they will give your detailed answer why.

Follow Ups:

I don't think so - harvey1 - November 20, 2001 - 19:06 UTC
- Not nesessary. I published first paper when student. - alexander - November 20, 2001 - 20:50 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins