Any existing phenomena by definition is logical phenomena, because existence = "yes" (or "1", or "true", whatever symbol you prefer to label it by) versul lack of existence (label it "no", "0", "false", etc).

So, you only need something to exist to become logical.

So, there is nothing unusual in logical/mathematical behavious of existing objects and thus there is NO need in beings "establishing" rules.


By the way, HOW can "being" "establish" this simple rule: existing = yes, non-existing=no?

Should this "being" go over existing objects and mark them with "yes" and "no" marks? Ok, let's assume that He does just this with His big red marker (let's leave technical details to theologists). What then should existing object marked as "no" mean?

• Why the heck would he ever do that? - smartguy - November 15, 2001 - 21:38 UTC
• More of the same - harvey1 - November 15, 2001 - 22:08 UTC
  • Harvey, do you mean that if something exists - alexander - November 15, 2001 - 23:01 UTC
    • You can do whatever you want to do - harvey1 - November 15, 2001 - 23:16 UTC
      • Existence is logic, thus math. - alexander - November 17, 2001 - 02:01 UTC
        • Which is it? I thought you said logic comes from existence? - harvey1 - November 17, 2001 - 02:34 UTC
• Alex: All there IS is what there is! - dolphin - November 16, 2001 - 08:52 UTC
  • Alan, only primitive thinkers assign nature human traits. - alexander - November 17, 2001 - 01:22 UTC
    • Some may be assigning mechanical traits? - dolphin - November 17, 2001 - 04:16 UTC