No Cause Beginning? - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

No Cause Beginning?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on November 13, 2001 15:40:11 UTC

My argument is that there is no beginning. Therefore logically no need to begin.
The laws of physics may still be reducable.

IE. There may be a set of axioms that govern universes for all time. The universes can be logical in that sense and still have existed for all time. So based on your clarification I would claim that universes could have exisated forever and still be largely rational. I say largely as an irrational component could still be a factor of the universes. It seems that Goedel has already proven this to be true since it seems that he proved that some aspects of nature cannot be reduced to axioms.

Follow Ups:

I need your clarification - harvey1 - November 14, 2001 - 04:55 UTC
- irrational component - yanniru - November 14, 2001 - 14:38 UTC
Where did you get this interpretation? - harvey1 - November 14, 2001 - 16:36 UTC
- Essay seems to agree with my understanding - yanniru - November 16, 2001 - 16:02 UTC
Does it, though? - harvey1 - November 16, 2001 - 17:37 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins