Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Of Course It Could Be Enough...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mark on November 9, 2001 15:58:15 UTC

It implies that in "ensamble of universes" there never need be any "divine creator" to finely tune universe the way that our universe seems to be (in other words showing favoritism for emergence of life). It doesn't rule out possibility of "God", but it does weaken the "pro-God" argument that "the chances of a universe like ours randomly emerging with constants so finely tuned to favor intelligent life, are infinitessimal. Therefore our universe exhibits 'intelligent design' which can only be explained by prospect of 'divine creator'."

Logic sequence (or 'genetic code') of our universe was inevitable given the prospect of "eigenstate super-symmetric multiverse" (where multiverse in itself ehibits no seeming "divine choice" parameters (finely tuned constants)).

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins