Why wait for scientists to figure out how it all works?
Is it possible to fast-track millions of years of science into the future; in fact go right to the end of the journey of scientific discovery and start from the end and work backwards?
In some ways, it is.
The most basic possibility, that which must be at the end of the trail, n-years into the future, is "EXISTENCE".
O.K., start with "Existence".
Now work out what existence of a phenomenon must involve. Must involve a boundary giving the existent item distinction from surroundings or at least from "Existence".
When you vote in an election, it is YOUR vote. The very existence of your vote requires that YOU VOTE, i.e. that 'your vote' GOES BY ITSELF.
If someone physically moved your hand to cast not your vote but their vote (using you as a piece of mechanical equipment); there would not be any "your vote". Only their vote.
If they just point a gun at you and say "vote so-and-so (who you didn't want to vote for); it is your vote under duress. Still your vote- you could have refused to be influenced by fear. But it was not your non-threatened vote. So it was not comparable to the first example.
The very essence of existence is "goes by-itself-ness". If it doesn't go by itself in a minimal way, it doesn't exist. If an atom was ALL and nothing but manipulation by someone, with nothing being manipulated; then there's nothing 'at the back' just being/going by itself; so there would be no atom. Just the manipulation by person. Just as I explained with 'your vote' existence. Has to go by itself, or it doesn't exist; something else exists (their vote, their manipulation).(Still figuring out if I've got this logic right).
To be manipulated at all, something has to BE in the first place. Just be, going by itself. Or nothing TO manipulate.
Now, what happens when ONE something exists?
There must be a boundary between that thing and other things (or at least between that thing and Existence). So every '1' requires 2 sides (A, B)to the boundary.
Also: The boundary plus A side, gives you a pair of sides to the B side; the boundary plus B side gives you a pair of sides to the A side.
For one object, you thus must have three dimensions, three option-pairs of where you place the boundary and the two sides. Every '1' is 3-in-1. Everytime you use '1' you imply '3'.
This 3-way jump theory (one jump obviously 'at right angles' to the other two; can choose which one as there are three ways of experiencing being) must be at the end of the scientists journey.
Now just map two 3-way objects, three, four, etc. and map out all the existential relativistic possibilities in this abstract existence 'space'.
Then look at current science in terms of pattern-conservations (invariance), symmetries etc. by mapping with the 'musical chairs fields' that three-way-jump analysis provides.
Or another idea: what is conserved between all types of math, physics, everything in fact? This: basic criteria: Existence, freedom; comparing and matching of patterns. Match = symmetry + conservation law. Freedom = match potential (virtual match?).
10-D string theory not nearly wide enough- need theory from trillion years into the future- need most ultimate theory possible. Start there, work back. Make sense?