Alex,

Try as I may I cannot find anything objectionable in this last post of yours (LOL). Of course, I'm getting distracted at the prospect of the big Game 7 of the World Series, so maybe I'm just dropping my guard right now...

Nevertheless, I think maybe there's a semantic disagreement going on here. I realize there is something to e/m -- I'm not denying it and I'm not demanding action-at-a-distance. But I wonder if all our clumsy explanations and bizarre attributes are not just evidence that maybe there is an entirely novel manner of propagation going on here. Tunneling of a sort, and only particulate in that it reacts with particulate phenomena.

After all, I believe I saw you tell someone else there is no such thing as "wave collapse" -- I do not see how this is not yet another contradiction, considering how you define the photon.

I'll try to catch you on line this week, but week days are very busy and I only spend an hour or so per evening on line. Sometimes I get on line during lunch, but that's rare.

-LH

• Forgot to ask... - luis_hamburgh - November 4, 2001 - 23:36 UTC
  • Next possible level down? - alexander - November 5, 2001 - 00:36 UTC
    • Two squared questions - luis_hamburgh - November 6, 2001 - 00:00 UTC
      • Some string models predict graviton to be 5 dimensional. - alexander - November 6, 2001 - 02:07 UTC