Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on November 4, 2001 23:35:08 UTC


Try as I may I cannot find anything objectionable in this last post of yours (LOL). Of course, I'm getting distracted at the prospect of the big Game 7 of the World Series, so maybe I'm just dropping my guard right now...

Nevertheless, I think maybe there's a semantic disagreement going on here. I realize there is something to e/m -- I'm not denying it and I'm not demanding action-at-a-distance. But I wonder if all our clumsy explanations and bizarre attributes are not just evidence that maybe there is an entirely novel manner of propagation going on here. Tunneling of a sort, and only particulate in that it reacts with particulate phenomena.

After all, I believe I saw you tell someone else there is no such thing as "wave collapse" -- I do not see how this is not yet another contradiction, considering how you define the photon.

I'll try to catch you on line this week, but week days are very busy and I only spend an hour or so per evening on line. Sometimes I get on line during lunch, but that's rare.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins