Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Bad Memory

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on November 4, 2001 20:10:26 UTC

The following quote does not come from me:

"Alex, your theory that
they come from symmetries is WRONG"

I have always agreed with you with regard to symmetries and natural laws.

But on the other hand your claim that a photon is defined by an accelerating charge is decidely wrong. Accelerating charges produce fields, both electric fields which change with time and from Maxwell's equations, also magnetic fields. I do not need you to tell me what a magnetic field is. But you need me to tell you what a photon is.
I am afraid that your conception of what a photon is is plainly incorrect. Please write down the mathematical relationship between a photon and an electric field for me. In your last post you indicated that photon depended on incoherence. That was you saying that right. So what does incoherence have to do with the electric field. Seems that you suffer from inconsistency as well.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins