Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Isaiah Part

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Phil.o.sofir on October 8, 1999 22:01:53 UTC

: : OK, lets get things straight here. Iīm not going to lean on any one side but i do belive there could be a God. It is very probable that life evolved by itself in an unrandom way but still but still subject to change. What does that mean? It was only a question of time before life became. Life is totally based on matter and so we need to find the reason for matters existance. I belive in the big bang theory, as an origin for your modern universe, but someone or something has had to create the singularity which exploded. Therefore there is room in science for "The ultimate creator of the universe" only he didnīt create the universe in itīs current form. If someone will argue with me on that one (And i hope someone does)i donīt want any quoteīs from the bible. The bible is written by gews and cristian men and has no proven truth execpt for vague historical descriptions and backrounds. And i want no replies from funny guyes.

: bzrd here: What evidence is there to suggest that "life is totally based on matter"? What about "cause and effect" with regard to big bang cosmolgy? On May 15, 1948, the United Nations formally recognized Israel; read Isaiah Chapter 66 vs. 8-10.

As far as the state of Isreal, it is much easier to follow a prewritten script (prophecy) than to create something new, all you have to do is work at it, sometimes for a long time, but this has nothing whatsoever to do with proving that god exists. As far as the united nations is concerned, they also recognize the lone religion of chrisianity by having the papal state (rome) as a U.N representative, talk about onesidedness! Is it any wonder Ireal was recognized, with this kind of offical infuence? Why was palestine not recognized during this exact same diplomatic effort? The offical explanation is becuase they refused to submit to certain requirements, but in reality these requirements would in effect say that thier religion was subordinate to christianity by defualt. The powers that be knew this and played the game toward this end. Oh, such a conspiricy, well explain any other reason, other than the official one that is!

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins