|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Big Bangs Are Agreeably The Most Logical Explanation So Far
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Phil.O.Sofir on October 28, 2001 18:09:38 UTC |
I pretty much go along with it other than the restrictive "there is only one of them" usually applied to it, as it nothing exists outside our own universe within the scope of our big bang area. Know one really knows how many there could be or if the universe is in fact infinite in all directions from any one concieved point. But does'nt the recurring expanding/contacting and recycling of the big bang concept go against some of the bigger accepted laws? The perpetual machine for instance is argued against, cannot remember what this exception is named, but if the big bang is reality, then it is a giant perpetual cycle, the same amount of everything still will exist overall in one form or another.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |