God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Harv, Are You "retreating"?
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Mark on October 25, 2001 22:36:20 UTC |
>>>However, if I continue the game of asking for references of your terms (each definition would just introduce more undefined terms), eventually you will run out of gas and admit that there is no reference you can point.>>You will ask me just to accept an undefined term and an undefined meaning of the axiom. This is a severe problem because if something is not defined then it is *not* logical - mystery if you will. In effect, your axiom based math world reduces to ontological mysticism (i.e., you admit that logical world is the result of Mystery). |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |