Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Becuase You Are Smart

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on October 18, 2001 14:13:22 UTC

"By the way, if you and Alex know so much about my "Theory", please forget the
opening and explain why the relationships I derive (from exactly the same symmetries
assumed by you and Alex and everyone else) things that aren't derived anywhere in
the literature to my knowledge. Oh that's right, I am wrong there too. Well in that case
why don't you show me where I am wrong on those issues? "

That's why you should publish it. Just publish the math and let others decide what it means. The only truth is the math. The rest in interpretation. My only argument with you is on the interpretation. But interpretation is liable to error. The pure math is not. It's the math you developed that is important to publish.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins