Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
A More Important Question

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on October 2, 2001 12:58:01 UTC

Alan,

Why do you keep asking me about Dick's ideas? I'm really curious.

To answer your question, it's because Dick's ideas are purely abstract. It's very hard to criticize an abstract idea, the only thing you can do is look for problems in self-consistency.

What do you think is wrong with the following:

a = b
b = c
a = c

Before you criticize, bear in mind that I'm not "describing" a, b, or c, just showing logical relationships between them. Is there any flaw in the above logic? I can't find any.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins