Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: ETX-125/EC Or G-5?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Asttrokidd on July 15, 1999 20:36:08 UTC

Terry - This may not be the most accurate advise available but here goes... The main differences between the Celestron G5/C5 and the new ETX-125 are the optical setups. The g5/c5 series are Schmidt cassegrains, and lend themselves combining fairly good optics with portabilty and reliability. The ETX is a Maksutav Cassegrain which is a little more delicate instrument, and has a bit more resolution for the money. The ETX also has a longer focal length which will produce more contrast in the image then the Celestrons. The ETX will outperform the Celestrons on planetary views, but is not as "Bright" when it comes to deep sky. The Celestron and Meade instruments go through very similar coating processes, so this should not be a factor in your desicion. Hope this helps...

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins