Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Question Of Your Theory?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Porter Hughes on March 3, 1999 12:17:43 UTC

: : : In regards to the queastionable article;More than one Universe. : : : How is it one should say that the universe was started by the Primordial Atom and the Big Bang. : : : I find it difficult to assume a mass of matter existed with no explanation as to its origin. : : : Should we not ascertain first the origins of matter in its simplest form before suggesting the cause and effect relationship of the Big Bang?

: : : : The big bang is only a theory, and so is what I wrote, I believe the Universe, all of them, had no beginning and will have no end. The cycle just continues, that is all. Furthermore, no one is to say that The Universe, or our Universe is the only type, there may be many otheres undetected, made of another kind of energy that we have never even dreamed of.

Can you think of any other matter, life, object, or anything that has no beginning or end?

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins