Wanda,

I have a student friend in physics at a leading eastern university who claims you are the Chairperson of a Department at his school. If so, I will not reveal your identity. But I have your email address and wonder if I could communicate with you privately.

I do like what you had to say about Dr.Dick's logic. I kinda skipped over those considerations and addressed his mathematics when I had a discussion with him some time ago on the G&S subforum. At that time he was claiming there were no assumptions in his theory, which I had a problem with. His math seemed to be OK and I thought he developed the theoretical aspects of a rather general symmetry along the lines of Noether.

But it is hardly a theory of everything-or rather in his words, an explanation of anything. Respectable physicists usually under sell their results and allow others to promote them, and perhaps give the results, if important enough, his name. Are you familiar with Tony Smith's work and his website. He also claims to have a TOE that explains string physics, psychology and spirituality and everything in between. He seems to have a few fans but is generally ignored by the physics community. He has never submitted a paper to the Cornell Archives for example. Then again, neither has Stafford.

I also found a recent paper by a physicist from U of Arizona that essentially pre-empts Stafford based on the Fisher Theorem. Forgot his name, but I can find the paper if you are interested.

Richard

• communicating privately with anonymous Wanda - kantolfir2 - January 27, 2005 - 16:21 UTC
  • My preference - wandaqueen - January 27, 2005 - 19:32 UTC
    • Hodge Podge? - kantolfir2 - January 28, 2005 - 00:15 UTC
      • Post above best viewed with screen resolution at 1024 by 768 - kantolfir2 - January 28, 2005 - 00:22 UTC
        • Mike prefers personal attacks - wandaqueen - January 28, 2005 - 03:01 UTC
          • That is an unjustifiable statement, and false too - kantolfir2 - January 28, 2005 - 04:30 UTC
            • Your thinking is not correct - wandaqueen - January 28, 2005 - 12:58 UTC
              • If true, 'twere easy to prove your statements , but they're not - kantolfir2 - January 28, 2005 - 16:17 UTC
                • Swine is obscene - wandaqueen - January 28, 2005 - 19:41 UTC
                  • see the link in the body of this message - kantolfir2 - January 28, 2005 - 23:13 UTC
• Wanda, IK am waiting for your answer - yanniru - January 31, 2005 - 02:27 UTC
  • I prefer to preserve my privacy - wandaqueen - February 1, 2005 - 13:14 UTC