Here Is A Clear Contradiction - an Astronomy Net General Forum Message

General Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Misc. Topics \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Here Is A Clear Contradiction

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rowanda on January 6, 2005 13:50:39 UTC

"That means that the algorithm for obtaining those expectations can not be a function of that mapping procedure described in the fabrication of the model. If it is a function of that procedure, it is most certainly the wrong answer as the expectations become a function of that procedure and not a function of the elements of C:"

"PSI depends on the mapping in the sense that the arguments of PSI are directly dependent on that exact mapping (in fact, they are the arguments); change the mapping and the set of arguments corresponding to a specific B in C may change violently"

Follow Ups:

Thank you for your attention. - doctordick - January 8, 2005 - 05:08 UTC
- A model of nature - wandaqueen - January 8, 2005 - 16:24 UTC
  - Harv???? - doctordick - January 8, 2005 - 17:24 UTC
    - Someone else came to the same conclusion? - wandaqueen - January 8, 2005 - 18:47 UTC
      - Are you serious? - doctordick - January 8, 2005 - 21:35 UTC
        
        You said it yourself - wandaqueen - January 9, 2005 - 03:49 UTC
        
        That is a worthless post! - doctordick - January 10, 2005 - 17:53 UTC
        
        "phenomena to be modeled" has to be specific explanation" - wandaqueen - January 10, 2005 - 18:48 UTC
        
        You haven't got the slightest idea what I am modeling! - doctordick - January 10, 2005 - 22:04 UTC
        
        You do not know me - wandaqueen - January 11, 2005 - 21:15 UTC
    - Dick???? - harvey1 - January 8, 2005 - 20:38 UTC
      - I already answered it! - doctordick - January 8, 2005 - 22:20 UTC
- Everything means infinity - wandaqueen - January 10, 2005 - 15:52 UTC
  - Harv/Wanda and who else? Maybe Bruce? - doctordick - January 10, 2005 - 17:49 UTC
    - I'm having fun - wandaqueen - January 10, 2005 - 18:58 UTC
      - I don't think you have paid any attention at all to what I say! - doctordick - January 10, 2005 - 22:12 UTC
        
        intellectual honesty is not your strong suit! - wandaqueen - January 11, 2005 - 13:48 UTC
- Sorry- you said 'Theory of Anything" - wandaqueen - January 10, 2005 - 18:53 UTC
  - And exactly where did I say "theory" of anything? - doctordick - January 10, 2005 - 22:17 UTC
    - Explanation =s theory in my mind - wandaqueen - January 11, 2005 - 13:53 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins