Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Sorry, I Overlooked This Earlier.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on December 22, 2004 21:43:37 UTC

Hi Wanda,

I presume you meant, "is that [the] reason [for] your model of explanation?"

If that is what you meant, I would have to comment that an explanation usually presumes causality: i.e., it provides some way of getting from known information to expectations. One could say that what they know will cause to happen what they expect to happen. Their expectations are based on what they know and understand.

The only expectation which does not presume causality would be the expectation that the future will bear great similarity to the past. Under that presumption, all explanations are really little more than data compression mechanisms. Or at least that is the way I see it.

Have a merry Christmas (or whatever) -- Dick

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins