Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Notice Harv Won't Address Objections Directly

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on October 20, 2004 17:17:08 UTC

I don't know how to fix this situation and I think Harv doesn't either. The situation is
Harv's strong wish, apparently, to "channel"
some profound amalgamation of physics and theology in a way that
1) doesn't pass any tests of rigorous criticism - and -
2) would please autocratic religionists who wouldn't even understand his reasoning while using derived slogans from Harv's ideas to bamboozle another generation to
bow to false dogmas.
Why can't Harv be satisfied with making a few
contributions in a lifetime via the scientific path of rigor, criticism and admitting "I don't know" when Harv doesn't know?

Perhaps God first judged the mind of consciousness and found that natural selection was needed because of the first conscious mindset (Adam?).
To mention again: Natural selection is not a design system made by God. Natural selection is
the mindless collision and deflection of units
of anything moving through time.
Harv, stop shunning God.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins