Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Science Is Concerned With HOW, Not 'what We Call It'

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on October 1, 2004 16:56:00 UTC

Richard ( or the more
Your religious chanting and love for the topic
impress me more than the analysis above.
At some point you might become sufficiently coherent on the topic as a result of this profound devotion. For now, what you are saying
is just warmup and is not consequential as physical science. A mix of religious meaning
and physical evidence usually produce intermediate form-types which can be beneficial and beautiful to individuals for whom they have meaning, but if one or more persons believe such products are universally true, those persons tend to create hazardous and distracting effects on their societies. My clear view is that thoe mixes of physics and religious meaning that you are experiencing are beautiful and wonderous, but to become truth and justice these ideas would require additional processing ...
Mike

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins