Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
A Cornerstone

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rowanda on February 5, 2004 21:31:06 UTC

Richard,

Thanks to you we have a basis to evaluate the subsequent work of Cahill. In particular, I appreciate your insight about theories that pin themselves down to previous theories, that indeed the extra terms may just be the next step in the determination of reality- will it never end?

And I never before appreciated how non-rigorous the best theories in physics are.

A question that came up in reading your post, Is the referential noise associated with the Heisenberg uncertainty and the role of virtual pareticles coming out of the vacuum? Anyway, as you say, amazing things are still happening in physics.

Oh yes. Does Cahill's work do away with your dark matter model of conscioiusness?

Wanda

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins