Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
We Need To Be Open To All Possible Illusions!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on September 11, 2001 13:45:53 UTC

Paul,

Essentially, I have no argument with your logic at all although I still think there are a number of minor misunderstandings in our communications. In order to save time, I will not comment about those misunderstandings and go straight to what I think is the crux of our differences.

>>>222. So, your half of the zipper is an analysis of physical reality. As you have acknowledged, your awareness is not part of that physical reality. It is my intent in my half of the zipper to show that C1 and possibly some part of C2, C3, and C4 may not be part of physical reality.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins