Hi Paul,

I have read your post very carefully and have no arguments with you other than one! I think I understand what you are saying and how it is attached to my work. My only problems are with paragraphs 53, 89, 93 and 97. In every case it is exactly the same problem: your wish to include as "real" (some part of existence) something which need not obey and may be exempt from the laws of physics; however, in each case you promise to argue this point later so I will suspend judgement. Other than that, I find your presentation perfectly logical and clear.

The problem seems to be that my difficulty is exactly the central issue of your presentation.

Looking forward to hearing more --- Dick

• Concerning Reality - Part III - paulm - August 27, 2001 - 19:37 UTC
  • A tad more!! - doctordick - August 31, 2001 - 02:25 UTC
    • More than a tad, I think - harvey1 - September 1, 2001 - 01:09 UTC
      • Actually, just a tad!! - doctordick - September 4, 2001 - 20:19 UTC
        • Concerning Reality - Part IV - pmartin - September 10, 2001 - 00:17 UTC
          • We need to be open to all possible illusions! - doctordick - September 11, 2001 - 13:45 UTC
        • Concerning Reality - Part IV (Continued) - pmartin - September 10, 2001 - 00:21 UTC
        • Good luck! - harvey1 - September 10, 2001 - 04:35 UTC