General Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Re: Meade 114EQ Vs. 60EQD: Neither
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Nathan356/">Nathan356 on June 15, 1998 22:43:38 UTC |
Neither. If you know nothing at all about astronomy, get a good beginner's book (I have "Nightwatch" by Terrance Dickensen which is good for starters.) and some good 7x50 or 10x50 binoculars. If you have already outgrown binoculars (here's a test: can you find M13 with them? If you can, you have probably found much more. If not, then try to find M13 first.), then the only telescope for $200 that anyone recommends is Stargazer Steve's 4 in Dob. E-mail me if you have more questions. -Nathan356 |
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |