RE: What About That Theory? - an Astronomy Net General Forum Message

General Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Misc. Topics \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

RE: What About That Theory?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Ed on April 13, 2000 02:02:43 UTC

Could he or she be right..... hmmmm. Einstein used thought experiments to arrive at energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.

We all know that as the start of modern physics.
As far as Dale Lake`s "theory" goes, all I can say is that even a broken clock is right twice a day.

To call this a theory is to incorrectly use the term. At this point lets call it an hypothesis
of an alternative reality. (Sounds to me more like something you would start a new religion with)

Follow Ups:

RE: RE: What about that theory? - Jon and American Heritage Dictionary - April 13, 2000 - 15:07 UTC
- RE: RE: RE: What about that theory? - comet61 - April 13, 2000 - 17:44 UTC
  - That`s a theory? - Sky Gazer - April 14, 2000 - 05:21 UTC
- RE: RE: RE: What about that theory? - Ed - April 14, 2000 - 04:24 UTC
  - theory? - franc - April 14, 2000 - 15:06 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins