Back to Home

Eyepieces Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Eyepieces | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
50x Apperature Rule

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Don McCrady on April 29, 2002 17:39:54 UTC

That's the rule of thumb I've used as well to evaluate a telescope's theoretical performance, but sometimes this doesn't agree with what the manufacturer or seller states.

For instance, I'm interested in a Discovery 12.5" PDHQ scope, f/5, focal length 1587mm. The 50x/" rule of thumb would give a highest useful magnification of 625x. However, if you go to astronomics.com and look up the details on that scope, you'll see that it indicates the highest useful mangification of only 317x, about half the 50x/" rule.

My not-too-informed conjecture is that with a focal length of only 1587, you'd need a very small focal-length eyepiece (about 2.5mm) to get that 625x magnfication. The 317x figure could be achieved with a 5mm eyepiece.

I guess a good Barlow is pretty much a necessity for fast scopes like this.

Opinions?

++don;

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins