Back to Home

Eyepieces Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Eyepieces | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Never Saw That One

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bob Sal on February 14, 2002 13:39:24 UTC

Can't really comment. What's the apparent field size? That's important. Many of the eyepieces over 40MM have a small apparent field. I saw the Meade 56MM Series 4000, 52 degree apparent field. I didn't like it. I'm used to the 67 degree fields on my eyepieces. The 56MM looked like your looking down a tunnel at a small image at the bottom. The apparent field size determines how big the circle your looking at is. Two eyepieces the same size but different apparent filds is like the difference between watching a 19" TV and a 35" TV. It's the same picture only bigger. The 56MM on my scope was less magnification but a smaller image and 52 degrees is not that bad. If the Celestron 50MM is less than that, you might not be happy with it. Then again, you might.
That's it;
BOB SAL

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins