Back to Home

Astronomy Discussion Forums

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Can Respond Quickly

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 19, 2002 18:26:39 UTC


Okay, I have a better understanding of what you are talking about. How about if we revise (6) as follows:

***6. It is possible to label all 'things' with a number if we can identify those 'things' for discussion. 'Dead horses' are excluded.

This meets the criteria which I think you are targeting:

"For example, you said "(t)he only possibility is that you believe there exist things you can believe in which cannot be referred to in any way. If that is the case then I say we cannot discuss them! You are beating a dead horse."

Since we are not talking about 'things' that cannot be referred to in any way (the 'dead horse' as you call it), therefore the dead horse must be excluded from (6). I can agree to that condition.

Let me know your thoughts.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins