Back to Home

Celestron Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Celestron Equipment Discussion | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Bottom Line

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bill Dittus on May 10, 2005 19:16:30 UTC


In all fairness, comparing a vintage C11 with starbright coating to a new LX200 with UHTC is moot.

1. Celestron does NOT manufacture scope to the quality today that Meade does. PERIOD!

2. The Mount of an LX200 is far superior to ANY mount except the Ultima 2000 which Celestron no longer manufactures.

I personally own a Super C8 Plus with original fork mount and AC drive, and it will continue to function far longer than any modern scope now made, but will NOT track nor allow for a purely stable platform for astrophotography.

I think this really answers the question.

Modern scope...LX200 period

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins