Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
HMMMM

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Morgan Storey on February 18, 2002 04:05:03 UTC

Well from what I read of the article it did say that the people that worked out this theory, the only reason they worked it out was because they thought there were some obvious flaws in the thory of blackholes.
I realise that blackholes do suck in even space around them, but the only thing I think is that theoretically something cannot go faster that the speed of light (the speed limit of the universe...LOL) and that theory is broken if anything falls towards the singularity of a blackhole as you would fall faster than light.

And 26 dimensional, how do you work out more than 4???

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins