Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on March 6, 2001 22:18:16 UTC

I can't blame you, it hit me exactly the same way.

By the way, I have seen no response to my last post to you (just below this). I was hopping you don't classify me in #10 of your note to John Powell. If you do, you have not understood what I was doing. I have no arguments with classical physics at all. My argument is with the mental picture supposedly defended by classical physics.

If you read what I say carefully you will see that I am constructing a mental model which generates exactly the classical results but from a different perspective.

And, please, don't be put off by the fact that I capitalized my responses. It was not done for emphasis. I only used that because you had already used some quotes. On re-reading it, I see it looks offensive and I apologize.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins