You are an idiot! I am presenting a tautology. If it is beyond your mental abilities to follow what proceeds from a definition different from your own, then it is beyond your mental abilities to follow what I have said.

I used the word "our" in the sense that we (the reader and I) were thinking of the same model. Clearly I was in error, you apparently cannot comprehend the model I was presenting.

By the way, time cannot be measured even in your model! In your model, the "time" between two events depends on the path followed by the observer, while the definition of time says that "if two objects can directly interact they occur at the same time". But I am wasting my breath!!

Go play -- Dick

• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Einstein the god! - bruce - January 27, 2001 - 21:52 UTC
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Einstein the god! - bruce - January 27, 2001 - 23:11 UTC
    • i think - gwynj - January 28, 2001 - 03:58 UTC
      • Re: i think - bruce - January 28, 2001 - 04:31 UTC
        • cute! - gwynj - January 28, 2001 - 05:22 UTC
          • Re: cute! - bruce - January 28, 2001 - 05:43 UTC
            • Re: Re: cute! - gwynj - January 28, 2001 - 05:56 UTC
              • Digressing to Einstein & poetry. - muqua - October 6, 2002 - 07:05 UTC
  • Sorry. - doctordick - January 28, 2001 - 14:01 UTC