Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Maybe You Need Glasses

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Brian Kirk Parquette on January 12, 2001 00:59:50 UTC

{[( WHY: THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG - The Big Bang Universe 'has a (speculatively presumed'super split second') beginning' and a speculatively presumed (entropic 'heat death') 'ending'. Unlike the Steady
State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent
reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which
(Steady State Theory) was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven expansion
of the spatial universe 'must result; "inevitably" in the dissipation of occurrent numbers (density) of objects
occupying given units of space over extensively progressive periods of time.' A Steady State Theory projects a
general uniform density of space, rather than a dissipating
space projected in a *Big Bang translation of
Universal History. From the more dense - relatively smaller - past;
into the increasingly less dense and
ever-enlarging future. *Space always becoming more dissipated with increased passage of time in the spatially
expanding, Big Bang. Which is what is said to 'inevitably' result when the dissipating universe of the present
and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) past.
Eventually 'intersecting' very densely, when and where an
explosion (*Big Bang) is said to have occurred.
Proclaimed by the big bang gang (not to mention NASA) to be the cause of the recently discovered, spatially
expanding universe' - *therefore 'thinning out' with the
passage of time. Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a
desperately concocted (1927 emerged, Henry Silpher discovered,
Edwin Hubble refined, Lemaitre generalized),
ad hocly makeshift history. The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in response to
the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is expanding (1927-'34). Back-tracking the observed
expansion through past time seems to find the observed expanding
universe at a point of convergence - an
intersecting point where all the matter of the universe was
presumably joined in one singular 'cosmic egg'. What
seems 'inevitably', to be ('therefore') a universal 'beginning'.
Yet, there is, in astrophysically proven and agreed
upon fact: no common center from which the spatially expanding
universe recedes. The expansion is proven,
dynamically structured as though the center (alleged origin of the 'big bang' - said to be the beginning cause of
the observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the location of any given observation
point: the structural dynamics of the observed expanding universe are such that always the 'red-shift' recession
of the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects)
is: in direct line of sight; moving directly away
from points of observation; wherever they are located... Establishing a structural expansion corroborating a
physically and spatially expanding - steady state - universe.
Where 'the center' is ('would be') everywhere; as it
is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of mass ('charge'/'disturbance'; systems of combined particles)
and its (their) generation of omnidirectionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity as the collective cause -
and 'origin' of the observed, red-shift measured expanding universe. The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past's
intersection of three dimensions to a 'point of origin' (the anticipated 'end' of retroactively expanding space - traced
backwards in time to 'an inevitable intersection' and consequent
point of 'beginning'), does not apply to a four dimensional space-time continuum. The past of which is progressively
smaller, to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially
expanding ('Big Bang originated'; 3-Dimensionally
fixated) universe is traced backwards through past time from the present. Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is
popularly said by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an
intersection where 'space ends': in three dimensions. There is no
open argument against the omniscience of the four dimensional space
time continuum here. It is simply and altogether excluded as a solution (refer 'option'/ AKA, ultimatum). The Big Bang Theory denies
altogether here, what its perpetrators say they acknowledge...Meanwhile. The Big Bang Theory instantly goes extinct,
when it comes in contact with the (Invisible, 'What? ') four dimensional space-time continuum. Whereas, in four dimensions (when
space-time is not excluded from the universe, as the Big Bang Theory
excludes the 4th dimension altogether), past space goes on ever-smaller forever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as largeness:
with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located everywhere
in the occurrence of matter-field 'particles' (without a spatial
limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter, culminating in the alleged explosive 'beginning'); in the
increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever
larger forever in the increasingly distant future; to infinity.
(Although black holes have yet to be proven, they are nonetheless extremely controversial and have strangely taken the foreground of discussions in theoretical physics. Their cause - if they exist at
all - is not controversial. Presently, with the exception of this offering, there are not even any formally submitted guesses as to
their cause. If black holes exist, until further notice, they are -
ostensibly - the causative result of a contracting four dimensional space-time continuum; that is to say, a four dimensionally contracting
material system, becoming ever smaller and more dense:to microcosmic infinity.) The four dimensionally expanding
steady state universe(universal density) remains always the same
relative density; consisting always of the same amount of
energy, increasingly distributed over - creatively becoming -
an ever enlarging space; from microcosmic infinity, to macrocosmic
infinity. Without infringement on the law of conservation
of Mass-Energy 4-D smallness (of past space-time) as infinite as 4-D largeness of future. With the present eternally in the middle of micro-cosmic past-smallness and macrocosmic future
largeness. Whereas, the 3-D pie chart intersects 'end-space' where all of it's ever narrowing slices
come together at the center. A weightless apple pie, without gravity. Whereas, the four, five and
six dimensional universe demonstrates and reinstates a (Bondi-Hoyle represented, 1948 introduced, then abandoned), Steady
State universe; without beginning or end. The same amount
of ever-expanding energy distributing itself over in-creasing amounts
of space - all densities per coordinately systematized frame of
reference remaining relatively stable and 'unmoving', 'static',
'not expanding': relative to all other comparably expanding material
in a given coordinate system - to infinity. 'Disturbed areas', 'spreading indefinitely.' Generating 4-D space-time:)]KBR}

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins