Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Brian Kirk Parquette on November 1, 2000 02:45:25 UTC

you will, and, even for that matter, if you will not. (There is nothing to negotiate:) Turn. Or Burn. (Pivot Or Divot) Continued: "Either,
matter is found to exhibit Doppler shift and is therefore recon-firmed to be 4-Dimensional. Or, matter does not exhibit any evidence of
Dop-pler shift, and, therefore, cannot possibly be a 4-Dimensionally expanding; accelerating field. "Presently, to briefly introduce for
review one of the several un-expectedly discovered prevailing conditions of reality; derived yet once again directly from Einstein's
combined Theories of Relativity. Its original technical derivations are the mathematical equations of the Dutch physicist, Hendrik Antoon
Lorentz. Einstein's functional incorporation of the Lorentz equations within Relativity Theory, are, for this reason now totally
acknowledged-among and familiar-to the physical science community at large. Specifically these equations are termed, 'the
Lorentz/Lorentzian Electromagnetic Equations'. Successfully and covariantly employed by Ein-stein, combined with Maxwell’s
electromagnetic equations, to describe the be-havior of sub-atomic ‘particles’. Although H. A. Lorentz originally intended their application
exclusively to moving sources (‘particles’/’charges’) of electromagnetism or light, Einstein very interestingly found another and quite
unexpected application for them. Specifically, Einstein discovered that Lorentzian Electromagnetic Field Trans-formations are
descriptively applicable to matter (in motion) itself. (A reoc-curring echo in the acoustically unimprovable halls of science?) ((What?))
The term, 'Lorentz Transformations' may sound somewhat formidable. What is mathematically and faithfully described here is still
however, non-math-ematically, already familiar to all of you. To quote non-mathematically, exactly what Lorentz Transformations
de-scribe, by way of what Einstein categorically proved: 'Matter: contracts in the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional
to its velocity'. That is to say, matter, be it rocket or rhinoceros, and all of its contents, con-tracts in the direction of its motion at a
Lorentzian measured rate increas-ingly proportional to its velocity. A brief but excellent non-mathematical elaboration of this fact can be
found on page 190 of THE EVOLUTION OF PHY-SICS, by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld. More elaborate documentation of this
fact is available in any advanced physics text on Relativity. Fact #5. "I call this Einsteinian phenomenon of the Lorentzian contraction of
Matter, 'MassField Doppler Effect'. It not only re-confirms that Matter is a 4-dimen-sionally expanding field, it also proves once again
that gravity is the 4th Dimension. One may quite reasonably ask why Einstein's successful and renowned ap-plications of Lorentzian
electromagnetic Field Transformations to Matter: have never been recognized as MassField Doppler Effect. That is an extremely relevant
question, and it has an equally fas-cinating and yet familiar 'answer' - that being that anyone and everyone can 'see' and therefore 'knows'
that Matter, that is to say, physical reality at large 'is not' expanding. "The contemporary 4-Dimensional dilemma unmistakably
resem-bles the pre-heliocentric era (before Copernicus - 1473 - 1543), where everyone and anyone could 'see' and therefore 'knew' that
the en-tire cosmological universe - the entire heavenly celestial vault - revolved around the earth, east to west; every 24 hours (rather than
the earth revolving on its own axis, west to east; creating the illusion that the universe is revolving around it). ‘It is all right to consider,
but not to believe (‘they say’): none of what you hear second hand, and half of what you see first hand’. - A Persian parable,
paraphrased (Author unknown). The only distinction in this presently subjected case, being of course, that everyone and anyone can 'see'
and therefore 'knows' that universal matter is not - certainly including people and all of their however too-often regrettable paraphernalia
and impor-tune trappings are not ('...obviously not'.) - expanding (4-Dimen-sional) field(s). Patient: ‘What have I got, Doc?’ Dr. : ‘Have
you ever had this before? Patient: ‘Why, yes, I have’. / Dr.: ‘Well. You’ve got it again’. Rx: Wake up and smell the formaldehyde: Such
a disturbing dynamic would indeed have a dramatically end-less, prohibitively incredible tendency to expansively spread. The very
thought is perishable. On Galvanically wired, Pavlovian bell ringing, frog’s leg & knee-kicking contact (‘Ostensibly, *everything is not
+expanding’. The 4 dimensionally proven experimental results with its sub-jectively unprecedented - yet all along - conclusory *object: is
discarded the moment +it is 3 dimensionally +subjected. A liberally practiced scientifically compromised, socially acceptable agreement to
compromise; to actively mis-represent the power and social role, and certainly the limitations of physical science. Instead, become a
politically correctionalized, word-warfare inspired malefactor - an anonymous, nameless, faceless institution of scientific-moral arbitration.
Where no one is responsible for anything. A perfect place to hide. As though reality in the human experience can do without morality.
Always the first compromised value, in the construction and maintenance of cor-ruption. Meanwhile, back in and digressing to mere, yet
to be properly inter-preted, fancifully escapist 4-dimensionally ‘illusory, phantom-preoccupied, extremely disconcerting reality which has
yet to receive proper interpreta-tion’...).

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins