RE: RE: RE: *mathman - an Astronomy Net Blackholes2 Forum Message

Blackholes2 Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes II \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

RE: RE: RE: *mathman

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Thanh Nguyen on March 26, 2000 18:45:22 UTC

My friend predicts starlight bending as good as GR,(just a very little bit difference). I would like to say more about "her theory" here. The third Pro. said:"It is not wrong" because he could not prove it is wrong. And he said:"It is not right" because it is different from GR!?.
What is the difference? Her "theory" shows that present concept about black holes is not completely correct. It shows that nothing can hold light (with its gravity). It shows that X-ray and gamma ray detected come from black holes directly but not come from the so called event horizon.

Follow Ups:

RE: RE: RE: RE: *mathman - mathman - March 27, 2000 - 01:38 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins