Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: White Holes

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Zephram Cochrane/">Zephram Cochrane on February 25, 2000 19:32:35 UTC

: This theory requires a white hole, if I have understood it right. Have any white holes been observed?

ZC: Nothing we have observed has been identified as a white hole.

:They should be relative easy to see if they send out all the energy absorbed by the corresponding black hole. And if none have been observed, what could this mean?

ZC: One thing it could mean is that we just haven't seen them. Another thing it could mean is that we just haven't identified them. Another thing it could mean it that the probe can't escape the hole and there are none.


Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins