|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Re: Chance Or Destiny
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Jeff on February 17, 2000 06:29:17 UTC |
: : Hi all, : : I was watching a documentary about black holes last night and I had a thought. On the show they stated that all matter is destroyed at the singularity. I find it hard to believe a minuscule point could contain the mass of a star. : : And because matter can become energy, and vice versa, wouldn't the matter be converted to energy? : : If that is so, at the singularity there is a huge energy situation, isn't this what is believed to be the start of the big bang. : : What if the universe did not have just one big bang, what if it had many? The first big bang could have produced a massive galaxy, then a massive star collapsed and sucked in everything from around it over billions of years, then when the energy reached the point to create another big bang., it created more super galaxies, and so on, till now. : : And because the galaxies are getting smaller and further apart the chances of this happening is getting smaller and smaller. : : If this is not feasible, please explain. : : Thanks : : SuperCujo : To overcome randomness was key for the big bang. The big bang which allowed this creation was not one in a billion billion chances as postulated by quantum physics. The big bang was a pure math dance of the harmonic set {1,2,3,4} setting the possible futures. Expanding into newly creating space, defined as the inverse square law, 1 over distance squared, as derived from pi r squared, expansion allowed the quantum translation of possibility into probability as defined by 2n squared (once again that circle imposed on spherical space)... (1,2,3,4} turns into {2,8,18,32,32,18,8,2) which is the maximum electon probability for each shell of an atom (the eighth shell a very unlkely probability). : Thus, the harmony and the lack of any pre-existing space-time sets the original big bang apart from a mini big bang. If not invested with the original harmony, the same harmonic force which overcomes entropy today, a.k.a. lifeforce, god, etc., entropy would completely rule and all would fall apart before starting. See ya. Jeff: None of that means much unless i believe you. Sciece is proof, of course till it hits belief. |
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |