|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Re: Big Bang =big Bull
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Zephram Cochrane/">Zephram Cochrane on January 21, 2000 00:07:44 UTC |
: 1)Not enough time since the BB for the features we see to have formed(gravity is too slow)-Galaxies etc etc : 2)Quasars obersvered around the time of the big bang-how? : 3)The variations is the microwave background being so close to the limilts of COBE instruments : -all 200million Dollars worth-"like looking into the face of god"-NASA enters WWF sytle hype. : 4)99% of matter has not yet been detected(for the figures to add up)-"dark matter" if it exists would only account for 10% of this. 1, and 2 are the really the same claim and are wrong. Whether 3 is close to the limits is irrelevant. The fact is its evidence for BB not against it. You numbers in 4 are way off, but that's irrelevant too because its not a real big problem with BB. It is a problem with big crunch. Besides we've already found a lot of the dark matter. Given time we'll find the rest. : so what? how dare we question science's version of Genesis (chapter 1) We Dare because its blatantly wrong.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |