Blackholes2 Forum Message Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
 Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...The Space and Astronomy Agora Re: My Theory Of Black Holes Take It Or Leave It. Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response ToPosted by Nothing. on December 25, 1999 19:18:51 UTC

: Theory is as follows : Consider any explosion has to throw away energy everywhere surrounding itself. : Then Black holes are created in exact same spot from where energy is thrown away Why should it be? : In universe its known huge stars after their due life ,die by exploding themselves and the spot where explosion takes place starts retracting the energy given this is were black hole fundamentals come into picture. Black hole starts absorbing the energy that was given away anything thats in its gravitational pull : is sucked in . : But whats the reason for absorbing whats given away due to explosion. : Only reason is this is so if UNIVERSE IS FINITE or expanding at a slow rate by which explosion rate is quite as many thousandth times the expansion of universe rate . : So now if know the rate at which energy is being absorbed by black hole we may come to know actual expansion rate of the universe. : I personally do not agree to UNIVERSE EXPANSION since : energy get increase by itself. If UNIVERSE IS FINITE only then BLACK HOLE theory holds good.

: but above is my point of view take it or leave it.

--------------------------- WHAT IS 'EMPTY BOX'-problem

Space can 'expand'-growing bigger, or 'not expand'-going smaller, or, be 'constant'. But, all three situations, still have few basic questions.

1. Where come(born) matter? 2. Where go(die) matter? 3. What amount(how much matter)is (exist)?

If first, when space was not wake up yet, space was empty. And matter dont exist. Then, there is not exist, matter or matter energy. How then, energy can made matter?, or matter can made energy?

This is 'Empty-box'-problem, allways same, and unsolved problem.

---------------------------------

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information

 Web www.astronomy.net
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins