Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Re: Black Hole Vs. Big Crunch
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Lau, symmetry is beautiful/">Lau, symmetry is beautiful on November 28, 1999 14:14:34 UTC |
: Is there a theoretical difference between a Black Hole and the Big Crunch?? (Both are immense gravity wells) A Black Hole has no theoreticle max mass, hence it could absorb the Big Crunch; yet the Big Crunch is everything including all Black Holes. And if the Big Crunch follows the same basic rule of no max mass, why would the Big Bang occur at all. Lau: With the superstring theory, the big bang is seen as break down from a 10 (or 11 or 12 etc.. depending on which theory) dimensional universe (false-vacuum)to what we now have 4 dimensional space-time. (the vaccum state) The big bang ocurred because nature prefers the lowest energy state and not because of the big crunch. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |