Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: NEED MORE INFO

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by thed/">thed on December 16, 1998 03:55:50 UTC

: In order to see an ant better I use a microscope. : The microscope is far bigger than the ant. : So we do not need tools smaller than the object we are : viewing.

But how do you go about seeing an atom? To make a microscope big enough to see an atom you need a huge lens kilometers in diameter. Plus, to 'see' the atom you need to bounce light off it. I put it to you that to see an atom it is better to bounce smaller things like electrons, other atoms or high energy light of it and measure the effects on the electrons/light/smaller atoms. Electrons/light and so one are smaller than the atoms you are 'seeing'. So you do need tools smaller than the thing you are watching, the tools are just sub-atomic particles. The machines you need to generate the tools are huge particle accelerators many kilometers in diameter though.

: But then again I think we will never find "the smallest" part. : Because every small part we have found and will find : will made up of two or more even smaller parts.

: Science=Religion

This is an old Greek philosophy, about 2,500 years old. Unfortunately it has been supplanted by Quantum Mechanics which says that the smallest particles can only occur in integer parts. There is no such thing as half an electron.

Granted people once believed atoms to be indivisible but they where then found to be made of neutrons and protons. Neutrons and Protons where then thought to be indivisible and they where found to be made of Quarks and Gluons but there is currently no evidence that Quarks and Gluons are indivisble.

Analayse and Discuss.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins