Excepting For The Classical Sense - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Excepting For The Classical Sense

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Tim on November 15, 2004 03:39:54 UTC

i agree with your opinion. the classical understanding of particles is where i'd diverge. but i am interested in your explaination.
regards tim

Follow Ups:

Classical theory of particles - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:06 UTC
- Another coincidence - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:31 UTC
  - ...or i-i-is it? - carefuluniverse - November 17, 2004 - 04:20 UTC
    - Ruquist is right - wandaqueen - January 22, 2005 - 03:33 UTC
      - Ruquist very well might BE anonymous Wandaqueen - kantolfir2 - January 22, 2005 - 20:31 UTC
        
        Mike is just illiterate about science - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 04:04 UTC
        
        Devise a proof which will satisfy an unfair, anonymous person - kantolfir2 - January 23, 2005 - 04:28 UTC
        
        That's no proof - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 14:08 UTC
        
        The alleged question was not asked coherently - carefuluniverse - January 23, 2005 - 23:06 UTC
        
        What is the matter? - wandaqueen - January 24, 2005 - 02:51 UTC
        
        Anonymous Wandaqueen requested proof then dropped the ball - kantolfir2 - January 27, 2005 - 18:51 UTC
        
        My preference - wandaqueen - January 27, 2005 - 19:27 UTC
  - Why not find out for sure? - duordi - November 24, 2004 - 03:18 UTC
    - Sure it has.... - bruce - November 24, 2004 - 20:50 UTC
      - Bruce is right. - duordi - November 25, 2004 - 15:13 UTC
- There is no evidence in the double... - bruce - November 15, 2004 - 20:11 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins