De Borglie wavelength = h / (M x V) where M x V is the momentum of the particle and h is Plank’s constant.
The wave length of any particle from an electron to the earth can be calculated if the momentum is known and the particle momentum of any wave can be determined if the wavelength is known.

Because I was considering the mass of a particle to be constant the momentum (velocity x mass) would only change with velocity and therefore the particle wave length would only change with velocity.

• parentheticly speaking & algebraicly speaking - sagefr0g - October 27, 2004 - 22:59 UTC
  • Correct and Incorrect - duordi - October 29, 2004 - 13:22 UTC
    • Electron microscope - yanniru - October 29, 2004 - 14:09 UTC
      • High speeds with respect to what? - duordi - October 29, 2004 - 15:06 UTC
        • Good answer - yanniru - October 29, 2004 - 17:21 UTC
          • That is a very insightful question. - duordi - October 29, 2004 - 22:53 UTC
            • QM defines all conditions - yanniru - November 9, 2004 - 15:32 UTC
              • You are made of.... - duordi - November 10, 2004 - 05:33 UTC
    • not so sure about all that but - sagefr0g - October 29, 2004 - 14:41 UTC
      • No not relativistic. - duordi - October 29, 2004 - 15:24 UTC
        • Waves do not collide - yanniru - October 29, 2004 - 17:25 UTC
          • Collision is not the only means of detection. - duordi - October 29, 2004 - 19:03 UTC
        • lets say one electron or what ever - sagefr0g - October 30, 2004 - 02:41 UTC
          • An entity does not magically change - duordi - October 30, 2004 - 04:31 UTC
            • presto chango is magic - sagefr0g - October 30, 2004 - 14:17 UTC
              • zitter*&%@# - duordi - October 30, 2004 - 18:14 UTC
                • single entity approach - sagefr0g - October 31, 2004 - 14:26 UTC
                  • It is imposssible to,,,, - duordi - November 1, 2004 - 18:26 UTC
                    • impossible???? - sagefr0g - November 2, 2004 - 09:48 UTC
                      • Ok - duordi - November 2, 2004 - 14:23 UTC
                        • not ok..... - sagefr0g - November 3, 2004 - 02:04 UTC
                          • Please specify.... - duordi - November 3, 2004 - 16:16 UTC
                            • stradling the fence..... - sagefr0g - November 4, 2004 - 01:02 UTC
                              • A field interaction at a large distance? - duordi - November 4, 2004 - 13:39 UTC
                                • as far as i know - sagefr0g - November 4, 2004 - 23:25 UTC
                                  • Double slit experiment - yanniru - November 5, 2004 - 12:44 UTC
                                    • The electrons which are interacting... - duordi - November 5, 2004 - 21:25 UTC
                                      • whats the "differential" velocity when - sagefr0g - November 6, 2004 - 01:19 UTC
                                        • You are correct. - duordi - November 6, 2004 - 20:05 UTC
                                          • Particle/Wave duality - yanniru - November 6, 2004 - 22:41 UTC
                                            • You said it but ... - duordi - November 7, 2004 - 04:41 UTC
                                              • Classical thinking - yanniru - November 8, 2004 - 00:14 UTC
                                              • Duane - sagefr0g - November 8, 2004 - 23:54 UTC
                                                • A model less path is a blind path. - duordi - November 11, 2004 - 17:48 UTC
                                                  • Duane- You seem to think that electrons exist - yanniru - November 12, 2004 - 00:57 UTC
                                                    • A wave form which - duordi - November 24, 2004 - 02:18 UTC
                                          • how it happens - sagefr0g - November 7, 2004 - 23:54 UTC
                                  • It is ineresting ..... - duordi - November 5, 2004 - 21:31 UTC