Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
" Universe Matter Develop Equation" Must Replace "The Theory Of

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Xieshangzhe on October 26, 2004 03:09:11 UTC

" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relatively" finally

Describe "universe matter develop series"(see《Universe deep internal relation----earth center "empty hole" theory》 that I post)
as "universe matter develop equation" in mathematics,it is the universe unite-field-equation that physicist dreamming to seek it day and night .
"Universe matter develop equation" reveal:atom is a small "solar system",neutron is the "planet" in it,there is not proton in it,proton is merely the composition of the e+ and neutron at the moment of atom beeing destroy,there is a little "sun"in atom;
And "universe matter develop equation" can invent atom bomb too,but it would be later to invent it,because the theory is putting forward until now,but it can better describing the whole course of the
atom bomb exploding;
And "universe matter develop equation" reveal the essence of the develop of the universe.
In a word,on the great road of science,"universe matter develop equation" go on the middle zebra line,but "The theory of realtively" go deviate the middle zebra line;it direction is right,but it go on by the roadside,it always can not guiding the vehicle-wheel of science to come back road middle;because nature is steady,but mathematics is ever changing,it is wrong that use "ever changing mathematics" to express "steady nature";in steady nature,there is only one value against,you searching a mathematical expressing formula but it is only a similiar,"The theory of relatively" just is a "similiar value" theory.
It is only the "universe matter develop equation" that can correct this wrong.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins