THERE'S ONLY 1 'VERSION-EINSTEIN'
(Q. What was the consensus of the non-sequitur, the prevarication, and the oxymoron?
A. Two wrongs don't make a right.
But three do.)
THE WHERE WE WERE: continued:
Brian Kirk Parquette introduced himself to K.B. Robertson, in Santa Cruz, CA., late '99;
and requested a copy of the 6th (condensed) edition of K. B. Robertson's 40 year copyrighted, internationally distributed small press books and essays (entitled 'The New Gravity', and 'Gravity Is The 4th Dimension: The Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field w'out Mathematics', Mr. Parquette showed much interest in the gifted book and asked K.B.Robertson if his work was on the internet. This was late '99, and at that time K.B. Robertson was - with the exception of word processing and print-outs - computer illiterate. Having heard much about the internet but never having been on line and having no direct experience with it.
Mr. Parquette thereupon cheerfully and zealously volunteered to post the issued work on the internet. Mr. Robertson gladly accepted the unsolicited offer, then provided Mr. Parquette with several floppy discs, the contents of which were not only Gravity Is The 4th Dimension, but also several other books, essays and anthologies also written by Mr. Robertson.
Thenceforth, B.K. Parquette did in fact post the work as agreed, while going on without authorization to post several other extended, verbatim, excerpts of other works by Robertson, including the published and copyrighted small press title: NOMADS, CIVILIZATION & WAR.
This was in late '99 and early 2000. As time went by, Parquette realized that since Mr. Robertson was not 'on line' on the internet, he didn't know exactly how his work was posted or at how many locations, or in how many ways.
By and by, a number of people who had read Mr. Robertson's hard copy books (sometimes decades earlier) informed him that there was a certain 'Posted by Brian Kirk Parquette' on the internet, who was copying and pasting variously extensive verbatim quotes from Mr. Robertson's book, without informing the reader of the authors's name, instead, closing out with Mr. Parquette's email address,for any further correspondence.
This dubious pattern evolved into Mr. Parquette making statements on the internet, listing himself as the 'Author' of K.B. Robertson's work, while in correspondence with any number of uninitated people who had no reason not to accept Mr.Parquette as being the author. These actions amounted to Mr. Parquette not only plagiarizing Mr. Robertson's work, but therefore impersonating him also.
Moreover, Mr. Parquette innovated a method of presenting Mr. Robertson's work as being divided into 'eight (or more) versions'. That is, 'version7einstein', for example, thereby rationalizing that Mr. Robertson was the author of 'version one', whereby Mr. Parquette felt redemption with excluding Mr. Robertson's name from any number of other posted 'versions' of Mr. Robertson's work - of which there are six editions, but only one - evolving 'version'.
Inevitably, Mr. Parquette entangled himself in the above described plurality of purloinments, was found out, and has ever since alternated between feigning and/or implying authorship, and sometimes claiming outright to be the author (as ineradicably posted in numerous posts on the net, where Mr. Parquette alternately curses the author while sometimes impersonating him. Denigrates his work one moment, plagiarizes it the next. Re: WAG THE DOG & SMOOCH THE POOCH.)
Whereupon, being found accountable for these 'misrepresentations' - frequently fulfilling the definitions for plagiarization, impersonation and identity theft: reluctantly providing - and ever since, occasionally provides
the internet address (URL) of Mr. Robertson's website (periphery.cc/~molly, and/or einstein.periphery.cc/ without further explanation, while directly implying that he - Parquette - was being unjustly held to account) the contents of which was on the floppy discs provided to Mr. Parquette, at the latter's voluntary request.
Mr. Parquette continues to exclude Mr. Robertson's authorship or name from defiantly ongoing, frequently posted verbatim excerpts of the latter's work: 'Posted by Brian Kirk Parquette', while brazenly excluding
the source of his posted material and the author's name, while referring the reader to his (Parquette's email addresses and other posts, ncluding 'version7einstein', for example.
Mr. Parquette's noteably active perpetuation of the described trespasses are abundantly proven not only in his posts - preceding this one - in this forum, but in many other posts, likewise following this one, also in this forum...
Obsessively spinning affectatiosly angry, thespian yarns - here and elsewhere - alleging,
'Mr. Robertson asked me to post his work' ('without pay'), with 'apologies to the world', 'for helping Mr. Robertson'; not excluding gender villification, name calling Mr. Robertson as 'foul mouthed', 'a Ph.D in filth', attacking Mr Robertson's crotch, perniciously proclaiming his - Parquette's -physical rape of Mr. Robertson, publicly describing Mr. Robertson as a threat to and molester of children.
Mr. Parquette thereby pubicly and inescapably
proving himself an active member of a documented, long historied, feloniously fugitive pedophile cult (upon which there is no statute of limitations), the objective of which is to transfer their collective and individual (direct and accessorial) responsibilities on to Mr. Robertson - ostensibly to disintegrate and disempower the latter's social credibility.
It is apparent that soon after Parquette made the first post as agreed, he was and continues to be in reciprocating correspondence with any number of long historied participants in the afore-mentioned collaboration of fugitives.
It is clear that Mr. Parquette was not informed that openly revealing his real identity was not the policy of the emailers who've
evidently made - and continue to maintain -
many contacts with him - responding to his affordment to correspond with him by the usual
provsion of his email address(es).
Mr. Parquette has yet to realize his precipitous open commitment to an unretractable series of what easily qualify as criminally heinous equivocations, far beyond the 'domestic' parameters of a 'civil suit'; the accountablity for and consequences of which he has voluntarily,
aggressively and self condemnatively assured.
These issues and their presently culminating
resolutions have been previously presented at
other locations on the net and will be further subjected in forthcoming posts, the contextual details and consummate legal and social results of which will eventuate within a publicly presented, private website.
Thank you for consideration of this missive.
Sincerely, Kent Benjamin Robertson.