Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Several Reasons Why

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Clerk on June 5, 2004 12:41:38 UTC

1. GR is NOT complete. Your thinking this is just wrong. If it were complete it would be a TOE. It is a self-consistent theory just like Newton's theory of gravity is self-consistent. But neither theory, nor any other in existence is complete.

2. The singularity in GR has never been tested or even observed. Again faulty thinking on your part.

3.QED has no infinities. They have been removed. Yet QED is tested right where the infinity was before it was removed. Not so GR.

But this subject is getting rather old and worn. If you persist in erroneous thinking, ge my guest. I will not respond to any more of your posts.

J

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins