Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Interesting But Vague.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Duane Eddy on November 24, 2002 02:51:52 UTC

I used my word processor to reconfigure the text to upper and lower case, and it helped.

Judging from the comments it would appear that great minds do not always select the best word processors.

The author seems to have a vendetta against Newton and Einstein. The arguments are difficult to follow and I believe they have some flaws but so did Einstein’s papers, so that parts is even.

The interesting thing about the article is that the author states that ..(“The Idea of Einsteinn Is Another Classis Example of Default Theory on Wrong Assumption but Accurate Enough to Predict Experimental Results.”)

Which seems to say Einstein’s assumptions were wrong but they predicted accurate results.

I think the authors’ emotional needs are overshadowing the desire for logic.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins