Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
You Don't Need Equations....

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Nicholas on October 31, 2002 18:21:25 UTC

A conceptual understanding of the big bang will suffice to explain the CMBR. According to the big bang theory, the early universe was "optically thick", meaning light couldn't travel very far without being absorbed. You can see that this would have to be so because a young universe would be very small and therefore very dense. Dense objects (like your hand or a table or the sun) are opaque to light and easily absorb. This is how the universe was.

Anyway, the universe was expanding. As it expanded, it got less and less dense and, eventually, it stopped being opaque to light. This point in time is often referred to as "the surface of last scattering", implying that the photons have not been scattered or absorbed since that time. The photons left from this period have a characteristic temperature (about 2.73 K, as given by a blackbody law) and make up the CMB. It's kind of like a photograph of the early universe. I believe that George Gamow predicted it before it was discovered. Many astronomers think he should have won the nobel prize.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins