Laws Of Physics - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Laws Of Physics

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Chris Duncan on April 27, 2002 20:27:38 UTC

We know how the universe started, and we know the rules to how matter interacts with itself as well as with energy are the laws of physics. But what created the laws of physics?
If you believe the laws of physics didn't exist until the creation of our universe, then the laws wouldn't be laws-only properties of matter and energy.
The proverbial question: What came first the chicken or the egg?

Follow Ups:

Modern proverb - splat - April 27, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
- Theory of Probability - fasteddy - June 15, 2002 - 21:35 UTC
- Theory of Probability - fasteddy - June 19, 2002 - 02:06 UTC
Mathematical symmetries. - alexander - April 30, 2002 - 21:36 UTC
- Mathematical Lips - carefuluniverse - May 1, 2002 - 02:02 UTC
  - Ignorance is not something to be proud of. - alexander - May 6, 2002 - 17:31 UTC
    - It's not whether we're ignorant...it's HOW ignorant - spazcon - May 7, 2002 - 05:21 UTC
      - It depends on what you want: to learn the truth or to compete? - alexander - May 10, 2002 - 18:22 UTC
        
        the other forum is full of delusional monsters - something - May 14, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
        
        You must mean me - yanniru - May 15, 2002 - 13:11 UTC
        
        no content? why post? - something - May 15, 2002 - 15:44 UTC
        
        No- I'm illiterate(nt) - yanniru - May 16, 2002 - 13:19 UTC
        
        Evolution's ramifications R personal so bluntness must B truth - occupant - May 15, 2002 - 23:44 UTC
        
        Peace is the end of evolution - yanniru - May 16, 2002 - 13:18 UTC
        
        Not so. You don't seem to have any intention of talking biology - occupant - May 17, 2002 - 04:22 UTC
        
        pardon me? - finlearson - July 26, 2002 - 22:51 UTC
        
        evolution - fasteddy - July 27, 2002 - 17:33 UTC
        
        However, peace is usually not defined as "absence of catalysts" - quiet - September 18, 2002 - 03:28 UTC
        
        natural laws are inadequate to explain literacy - something - May 15, 2002 - 01:26 UTC
        
        Yes, if babies would directly come from lips. - alexander - May 26, 2002 - 20:25 UTC
- The constants are important as well - yanniru - May 14, 2002 - 23:00 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins